TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.6 GB free of 15 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 23:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 145
59% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 363
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 62%
 Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AWS PVDISK 16GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 648
Write 4.5
SusWrite 15.5
46% 223 MB/s
4K Read 237
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
361% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 74%
AWS PVDISK 161GB
31GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 69%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples13x
GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples6x
SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples2x
RAM
29GBUnknownBench 65%, 119 samples26x
1x15GBUnknownBench 59%, 628 samples14x
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback