Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration828 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 87.3
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 97.5
51% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 250
26% 208 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 72
47% 64.8 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 115
Splatting 107
94% 115 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 41.2
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 8
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 54%
Esata-2 HDS723020BLA642 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 2.3
Write 6
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 18.5
8% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-890FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback