Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 89.7
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 88
53% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 105
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Acer(1025 0691) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 9.18.13.717
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 1.84
3% 3.24 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7.52
4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 340 312 313 315 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 328
Write 303
Mixed 352
SusWrite 331
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 31.6
100% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 265
203% 276 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
250GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 106
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 113
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback