Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 97
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 341
41% 314 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 5.69
5% 11.8 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 12.2
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 85 71 69 71 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 434
Write 297
Mixed 323
SusWrite 91.7
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 32.7
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 190
171% 258 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
897GB free
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 111
65% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-010.A00G 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BSIS 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback