Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 434
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 72.1
63% 75.7 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 53.3
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 95 82 86 91 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 290
Write 149
Mixed 172
SusWrite 89.2
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 29.6
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 110
90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 75%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
64GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 86 84 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 86.2
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 1TB
79GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 26.4
35% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2A2400C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2A2400C11 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback