Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 00:02
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 686
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 80.7
54% 68.9 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 76.7
54% 64.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 202 190 207 206 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 492
Write 174
Mixed 192
SusWrite 202
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 14.3
101% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 14
59% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 78%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
325GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 160 156 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 118
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 160
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.7
453% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
744GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 187 184 195 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 110
Write 124
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 192
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
245% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 114%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
397GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 28 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 180
Write 173
Mixed 65
SusWrite 27.7
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.1
268% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
455GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 26 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 44
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 27.2
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
6GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 102 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 101
Mixed 108
SusWrite 102
166% 140 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 8
636% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 8.1
645% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 93%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
12GB free, PID a205
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 43.5
Write 35.3
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 35.1
50% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
35% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB
255GB free, PID 6033
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 26 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 31.6
22% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback