Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 18:03
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 386
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 16.5
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 16.7
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 143 151 155 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 136
Write 156
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 144
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
158GB free
Firmware: JPFO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 69
Write 69.7
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 68.8
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 50%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 34.1
Write 32.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 38
46% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 11.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 3.8
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback