Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161209
Uptime125.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 05:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NCL-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 60
2-Core 111
55% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 268
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 21FD) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 23
Parallax 25.7
22% 25.4 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 30
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 103 127 105 74 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 130
Write 120
Mixed 116
SusWrite 89.7
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 16.5
49% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 21.6
18% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 178 180 178 182 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 172
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 176
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 103%
ZALMAN ZM-VE350 750GB
678GB free, PID 3e40
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 24.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 25.4
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback