bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH57JG
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 179
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 400
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38.2
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37.8
32% 39 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 131 133 134 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 206
Write 132
Mixed 128
SusWrite 132
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 17.2
60% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 20.2
18% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
193GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 135 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54333531553642465238432D48392020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback