Acer Aspire GX-781

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire GX-781  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire GX-781(KBL)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 280
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 724
79% 628 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 143
Parallax 119
104% 130 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 126
Splatting 104
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 305 342 335 335 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 337
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 326
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.4
248% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 339
261% 357 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 129%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 24GB
2133, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire GX-781 Builds (Compare 1,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Acer Aspire GX-781

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback