Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '19 at 02:09
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 174 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 611 63% 506 Pts	64-Core 1,037 64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% PNY(196E 1315) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 104 Parallax 103 86% 104 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 94 Splatting 80.8 81% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 116 132 149 158 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 392 Write 221 Mixed 250 SusWrite 139 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 15.3 86% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 22.9 41% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 74%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$101 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 657GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 147 152 154 154 154 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 155 Write 159 Mixed 40 SusWrite 152 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 131% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 17,029 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.8% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 25.3 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	121x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	45x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	23x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	13x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	25x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $409

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16