Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 443
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 69.9
64% 76.4 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 73.2
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 315 314 239 132 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 438
Mixed 367
SusWrite 226
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 43.5
157% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
56GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 399 421 432 434 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 428
Mixed 411
SusWrite 394
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 41.1
144% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 297
244% 348 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
57GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 109 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 108
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8502 1600 CL9 Series 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback