Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 11:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 140
56% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 463
43% 358 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 38.3
37% 42 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.3
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 107 131 91 134 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 442
Write 354
Mixed 320
SusWrite 122
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 18.2
66% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 44.7
48% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 183 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 168
Mixed 109
SusWrite 184
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250820NS 250GB-$107
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AEE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 77.5
Write 77
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 77.5
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 44%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB
234GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 59 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 38
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 57.6
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
149GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 68
Write 69
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 69.1
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 40%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
712GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 88
Write 87
Mixed 32
SusWrite 90.5
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE F6451U67G1600G F6451U67G1600G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback