Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 11:01
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 43
2-Core 86.8
42% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 111
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Asus(1043 0427) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 15.2
10% 14 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 16.6
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 58 58 60 60 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 252
Write 215
Mixed 204
SusWrite 73.4
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 31.9
107% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 112
88% 122 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 85%
Initio INIC-3639 96GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Read 31.4
Write 30.9
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 12.3
6% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 5.2
22% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 10.3
8% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 10%
WD 1600BEVExternal 137GB
33GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 22.4
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 11.5
24% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 15%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.1
10% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 16%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30
2GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 22.6
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 11.5
25% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
67% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback