Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 10:10
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 298
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1050
99% 820 Pts
64-Core 1448
90% 1448 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1682 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 94.4
Parallax 179
96% 131 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 129
Splatting 135
99% 119 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 55 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 498
Write 422
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 89.5
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 40.7
120% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 73.6
88% 155 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 91%
Maxtor 6B200M0 201GB
92GB free
Firmware: BANC1B70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 54 54 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 52
Write 53.2
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 53.3
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 35.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.2
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback