Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 02:49
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 591
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 117
Parallax 98.9
93% 110 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M1009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 95 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 312
Write 92.4
Mixed 145
SusWrite 88
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 12.3
52% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 26.2
21% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
466GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 261 110 126 119 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 378
Write 469
Mixed 378
SusWrite 161
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.3
160% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 68.5
112% 212 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
285GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 70 67 71 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 63.9
Write 138
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 68.7
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0
39% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback