Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 17:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4350-$57
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 125
59% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 222
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 34.6
22% 31.1 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 34.6
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 405 282 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 326
Write 425
Mixed 366
SusWrite 252
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 31.7
110% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 192
144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 136 135 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 134
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 148 154 154 153 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 26
SusWrite 152
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ANKOWALL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback