Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120228
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 99.3
59% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.48
3% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 83 81 77 72 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 128
Write 101
Mixed 102
SusWrite 76.4
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 14.9
58% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91.6
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 90.4
70% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
34GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 60 72 80 69 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 58.2
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 70.4
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback