Lenovo 4174WG9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4174WG9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4174WG9
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 02:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%
CPU Throttled 5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 46.3
1-Core 13.2
2-Core 22.4
21% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 42.1
8-Core 43.6
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 50.4
3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O073
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 85 57 53 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 324
Write 311
Mixed 283
SusWrite 89
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 14.9
49% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 162
118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU5-GNL-F 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4174WG9 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4174WG9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback