Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 143 2-Core 281 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 776 79% 637 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 133 Parallax 142 116% 139 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 135 Splatting 109 103% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 193GB free Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 483 478 494 494 494 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 484 Mixed 409 SusWrite 488 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 66.9 226% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 364 273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,443 Write 6,216 Mixed 5,868 1,379% 6,176 MB/s	4K Read 741 4K Write 303 4K Mixed 420 1,822% 488 MB/s	DQ Read 1,867 DQ Write 1,235 DQ Mixed 1,312 1,043% 1,471 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 137GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 103 102 103 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 123 Write 96 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 101 73% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 23.5 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 25.6 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	386x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	291x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	203x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	122x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	92x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	46x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16