IBM 6223IS9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemIBM 6223IS9  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM MSI-9151 Boards
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20060412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz
CPU#1 , 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 60.4
32% 49.2 Pts
4-Core 85.4
8-Core 87.1
12% 86.2 Pts
64-Core 88.3
6% 88.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4500
Nvidia(10DE 02AF) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.286
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.34
2% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 74 77 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 74
Write 68.9
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 70.4
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 6 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.52% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback