Intel DH55PJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ DH55PJ__
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 10:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 13.5
2-Core 21.7
18% 23.7 Pts
4-Core 35.3
8-Core 52.1
5% 43.7 Pts
64-Core 53.7
3% 53.7 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 21%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Dell(1028 0402) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.3
Write 29.8
Mixed 20
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B2873EH1-CH9 5GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55PJ Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55PJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback