Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 23:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 12
2-Core 27.4
33% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 73.1
8-Core 140
13% 107 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 37.4
30% 38.3 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 33.7
30% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R1TB 1TB
511GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 167 199 197 201 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 222
Write 184
Mixed 194
SusWrite 184
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 14.7
59% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 19.5
21% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE 2TB
84GB free
Firmware: MZ4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 58
SusWrite 75.5
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback