HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83A5
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 259
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 731
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
HP(103C 83A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 146
Parallax 121
99% 130 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
97% 119 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D256-HP 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 276 266 298 266 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 974
Mixed 454
SusWrite 274
170% 768 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 67.5
203% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 348
355% 586 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 28.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback