Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte EX58-EXTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
71% 156 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 669
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 62.1
58% 68 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 70.1
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 497 396 400 401 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1282
Write 1,098
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 545
222% 993 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 63.8
217% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 681
512% 684 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 183%
Great: 302%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 931GB
60GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 163 158 145 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 221
Mixed 102
SusWrite 161
131% 178 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.4
463% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 90 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 99.7
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 90.6
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 112%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 69GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 241
Write 244
Mixed 101
144% 195 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
530% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback