HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,132
101% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 53
Parallax 47.2
46% 52.1 fps
MRender 44.6
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 48.3
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 607 372 340 272 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 983
Write 714
Mixed 785
SusWrite 388
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.8
196% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 723
555% 753 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 158%
Great: 182%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
806GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 126 135 141 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 137
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
284GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 79.7
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback