HP 700-400z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP 700-400z  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 19:29
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 128
50% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B17) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 9.69
6% 8.66 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Edge Boost Pro SSD 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 581ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 448
Write 67.4
Mixed 126
46% 214 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 9.26
4K Mixed 6.75
34% 9.74 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 5.94
7% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
573GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 112
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.16
92% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
100GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 82.5
Mixed 76.8
65% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 6.29
4K Mixed 0.39
177% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-400z Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 700-400z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback