Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 166 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 496 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M 5,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 197B) 2GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 7.56 6% 6.82 fps	MRender 8.48 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.78 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 146 88 91 86 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 374 Write 137 Mixed 214 SusWrite 103 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 37.9 133% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 118 129% 223 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	156x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	119x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	107x

SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	13x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	42x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $150