Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 44.2
29% 41 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 349
26% 237 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,248
Write 2,604
Mixed 2,649
700% 3,167 MB/s
4K Read 296
4K Write 357
4K Mixed 15.6
657% 223 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 378
270% 343 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
50GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 346 364 361 371 361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 447
Write 52.3
Mixed 373
SusWrite 359
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 34.8
111% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 282
216% 293 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 134%
Crucial_ CT525MX300SSD1 525GB
8GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 41.1
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 9
769% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 10.7
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 13.9
1,169% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 23
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $693
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback