Gigabyte Z370 HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 HD3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 03:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 735
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 73.2
77% 83.7 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 72.2
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 292
Mixed 186
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 16
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 26.9
34% 62 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
131GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 109 110 109 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 124
Write 97
Mixed 85
SusWrite 108
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 3,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback