Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI B360M Xtreme
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 01:18
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 755
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 89
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 70.3
73% 78.6 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 71.5
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 123 72 72 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 440
Write 292
Mixed 272
SusWrite 98.7
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 17.3
73% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 41.6
38% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
712GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 166 165 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 165
Mixed 120
SusWrite 166
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback