Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 00:25
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1136
101% 854 Pts
64-Core 2,121
131% 2,121 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 176
Parallax 175
149% 178 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 162
Splatting 114
126% 160 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3685 3915 3921 3918 3935 3931 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,224
Write 3,542
Mixed 2,194
SusWrite 3884
673% 2,961 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 71.1
241% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 45.4
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,196
730% 756 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 425%
Great: 496%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
66GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 291 291 292 293 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 450
Mixed 381
SusWrite 311
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 55.3
185% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
148% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
928GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 456 456 456 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 449
SusWrite 456
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 52.3
173% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 177
135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$195
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 148 152 148 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 148
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 121%
IB- 121CL-C31 Disk1 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 38.5
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 46.2
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 126%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback