Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '16 at 11:04
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 94.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 226 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 694 69% 560 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.164.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 74.1 47% 65.7 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 56.2 Splatting 54 48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 434GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1858 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 41 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 196901896	112% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 416 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 46.9 171% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 114 136% 240 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 395GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 14589104 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 91319594649886 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 424 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 60 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 45 90197262364 (C2) HDA temperature 28 45 90197262364 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14589104 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14589104 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14589104 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 94489280512 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3744 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2318 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2318 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1305 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1310724	67.7% Good	Read 508 Write 285 Mixed 252 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 19.4 80% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 49.4 59% 105 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 65%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 764 Write 605 Mixed 680 152% 683 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 47.7 193% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 164 178% 303 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 243%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 584GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 184999944 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 680 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 206904307 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9557 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 523 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 6 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 572063772 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 61 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8425 (C2) HDA temperature 28 42 77309411356 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -103938208553990 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12234404977 (F2) Unknown 100 253 44572793867	83.9% Excellent	Read 142 Write 150 Mixed 138 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.22 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 112%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 225GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7424 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4919 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 65699 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1734 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 40 31 (C2) HDA temperature 145 58 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 248726 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	28.6% Poor	Read 47.9 Write 51.6 Mixed 67.8 42% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.28 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x4GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.1% Very good	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 27.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 22 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	428x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16