Asus PRIME B350M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 02:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 638
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 78.7
65% 79.6 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 76.4
65% 79.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 64 87 64 51 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 471
Write 372
Mixed 317
SusWrite 107
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 29.9
132% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 182
166% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
722GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 172 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 171
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 171
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL32A16TS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-K Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback