Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 00:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 73
2-Core 115
60% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 177
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 131 159 162 163 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 456
Write 425
Mixed 373
SusWrite 168
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 190
185% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1600C11 Kingston 9905469-157.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback