Alienware M15x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAlienware M15x  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '16 at 15:10
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 166
73% 120 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 306
35% 274 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970M
Dell(1028 048F) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 18.3
17% 18 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 18.9
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX2 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 199
Write 108
Mixed 110
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 12.1
55% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 36.8
48% 87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36%
Great: 52%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
699GB free
Firmware: AX0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 99.9
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M15x Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback