Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 86 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 100 51% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 197 27% 198 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 16.2 11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 332 346 355 356 353 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 390 Write 347 Mixed 265 SusWrite 341 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 23 105% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 27.8 30% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 84%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 232GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 81 80 82 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 77.9 Write 52.4 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 80 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown OCZ3P1333LV2G OCZ3P1333LV2G Apacer 75.A83C1.G110B Apacer 75.A83C1.G110B 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16