Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190822
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 14:17
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 236
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 604
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 65 120 58 74 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1364
Write 925
Mixed 874
SusWrite 159
184% 830 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68.2
237% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 222
266% 446 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 163%
Great: 209%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
816GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 111 109 113 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 165
Write 112
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 112
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 27
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback