Gigabyte B360M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B360M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 03:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 124
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 239
29% 225 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.7% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 97.9
Parallax 84.6
74% 91.1 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 90.1
73% 89.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 343
Mixed 320
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 19.3
98% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 113
124% 209 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
811GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 166 166 165 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 154
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 163
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GNT 04CD F4-2133C15-8GNT 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M DS3H Builds (Compare 5,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360M DS3H - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback