Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive420% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1193
107% 901 Pts
64-Core 2,183
135% 2,183 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 115
Parallax 234
113% 163 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 133
Splatting 160
114% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2768 3524 3717 3901 3921 3927 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 3,356
Mixed 2175
SusWrite 3,626
638% 2,803 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 67.3
238% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1067
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 1,109
792% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 420%
Great: 496%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
12GB free
Firmware: 1.01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 428
Mixed 319
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 26.4
88% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 205
158% 216 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
OCZ VERTEX2 240GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.37
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 105
Write 84
Mixed 112
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 23.2
79% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 92.4
DQ Write 91.2
DQ Mixed 85.4
66% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 78%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
274GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 119 124 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 160
Write 139
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 108
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 83%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
856GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 136
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 122
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
112GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 53.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 44.1
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 248 247 249 248 249 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 83%
WD My Book 25ED 10TB
524GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 106 101 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 87.9
Write 98.4
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 101
126% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 41.5
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 36.2
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback