Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180424 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '19 at 20:08 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
76.2%
Very good
|
71% 123 Pts
|
62% 519 Pts
|
55% 887 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
|
52.3%
Above average
|
54% 73.2 fps
|
50% 61.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 249 209 205 198 201 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
129% 44.8 MB/s
|
30% 41.7 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
49GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 63 62 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
42% 56.6 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
12GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 93 97 100 99 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
56% 76.8 MB/s
|
127% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot 1600 CL9 Seri 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.1%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 471 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 108x |
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 62x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 37x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $92 |