Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 VA70_HC
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '16 at 17:49
Run Duration548 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 444
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 2.91
4% 5.08 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 8
5% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
112GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 263
Write 134
Mixed 178
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 16.4
69% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 85
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 32.1
46% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 73%
Adata SX300 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 480
Write 3.64
Mixed 6.67
34% 163 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.03
6% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
203GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 52.8
Mixed 47.9
39% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.31
77% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 43%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
59GB free
Firmware: AX003J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 73
Write 61.6
Mixed 57.6
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.18
62% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
7GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 4.74
Mixed 7.53
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.37
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 1.34
131% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX KHX1600C9S3/4GX Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback