Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook S15 X510UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UF
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 11:12
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 583
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1131) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3648
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 9.22
9% 9.68 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 8.57
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 420 422 408 421 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 439
Write 373
Mixed 277
SusWrite 417
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 27.5
109% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 80.2
64% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
325GB free
Firmware: SBFA13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 293 171 111 115 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 356
Write 217
Mixed 234
SusWrite 183
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 11.7
59% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 26.4
33% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 102%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: 3203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 38.1
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 14.8
7% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 10.8
37% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 12.7
10% 14 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 74%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
254GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 14.8
7% 33 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 16
51% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 24.3
18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 89%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 34
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 13.2
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback