Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 784
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 121
Parallax 113
93% 116 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 97 95 106 100 95 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 99.5
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 8.9
46% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 135
96% 121 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 82%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$81
423GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 439 424 445 447 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 384
Mixed 320
SusWrite 439
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 51.1
177% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 298
241% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
891GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 122 124 124 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 124
Write 96
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 123
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 156 153 159 160 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 155
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 153 149 154 153 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 139
Write 126
Mixed 112
SusWrite 152
180% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 30.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,047
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback