Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 04:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 158
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 506
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 86
57% 72.9 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 80.5
57% 67.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 221
Mixed 261
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 39.9
128% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 43.9
66% 122 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 117%
Hds725050kla360 39M4557 39M0158IBM 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: K2AOAT1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 55
Mixed 38
SusWrite 54.2
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback