Asus M51BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	24.3 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 125 57% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 363 37% 301 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 89 51% 72.5 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 54.7 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 857GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 93 94 103 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 66.5 Write 144 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 102 64% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 108%
JMicron Generic 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 119GB free, PID 0576 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 149 150 149 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 240 Write 149 Mixed 127 SusWrite 150 211% 166 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 7.2 1,383% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 39.7 DQ Mixed 7.5 1,672% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 28GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	98x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	13x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 12GBAdataBench 41%, 68 samples	8x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16