Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 22:17
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 696
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 82.7
53% 71.7 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 55.9
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 593 597 601 596 602 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,491
Write 2,004
Mixed 1533
SusWrite 741
325% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 78.7
240% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,212
908% 1,214 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 235%
Great: 277%
Corsair Neutron XTi 240GB-$149
141GB free
Firmware: SAFC02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 374 376 374 375 375 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 366
Mixed 319
SusWrite 374
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 42.4
163% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 164
171% 279 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
31GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 182 179 189 180 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 416
Write 185
Mixed 220
SusWrite 184
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 16.8
122% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.5
46% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 128 134 137 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 114
Write 137
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 136
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 72%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback