Acer Aspire M7810

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M7810 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FMP55
Memory	4.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100329
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 258 33% 250 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.97 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 4.22 4% 3.75 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900812 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 169 173 175 153 95 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.9% Above average	Read 234 Write 183 Mixed 203 SusWrite 154 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 20.8 79% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 158 125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 91%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 578GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 66 68 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 56.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 67.3 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 63%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$45 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 714GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 174 177 180 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 151 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 176 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2 368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 114 117 118 116 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 113 Write 98.8 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 115 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 16GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 12GB free, PID 5566 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.7 6.1 6.1 6.1 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 19 Write 6.8 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 5.8 10% 9.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.5 171% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 13%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 360GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 14.7 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 22.6 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 None CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 10GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M7810 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7810

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	14x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	3x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	2x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 38%, 703 samples	2x
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 604 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $492

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16