Lenovo 20EGS02P03

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20EGS02P03  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGS02P03
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '16 at 02:44
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 205
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 541
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2211) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.72
4% 6.04 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 485
Write 102
Mixed 172
55% 253 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 6.75
4K Mixed 5.29
28% 7.82 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 95%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB
12GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Read 12
Write 3.82
Mixed 5.13
8% 6.98 MB/s
4K Read 2.29
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.005
9% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback