Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 17:34
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 68
2-Core 135
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 273
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 81
Parallax 70
75% 81 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 72.6
68% 85.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,175
Write 2,689
Mixed 2,704
636% 2,856 MB/s
4K Read 210
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 50.1
436% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 212
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 433
Mixed 333
SusWrite 116
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 31.5
113% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 152
144% 225 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
567GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 139 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 62.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 138
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
920GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 150
Write 111
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 132
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V02L3L84GB528 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 12.4
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback